Exotic Powder Pulls Carbon Dioxide from the Air at a Record Rate

This story was produced in partnership with the Pulitzer Center’s Ocean Reporting Network.

Scientists and engineers are developing big machines to suck carbon dioxide out of the atmosphere, but the technology sucks up a lot of energy and money as well—as much as $1,000 per metric ton of captured CO₂. A team led by chemists at the University of California, Berkeley, has created a yellow powder that might boost this field by absorbing CO₂ much more efficiently.

Detailed projections indicate that to achieve climate targets, the world will need to remove far more CO₂ from the atmosphere than it is currently extracting. The U.S. is investing billions of dollars in start-ups developing direct air-capture (DAC) technology, which uses fans to blow air through alkaline materials that bond with the slightly acidic CO₂. Lye and lime powder are sometimes used in this process, as are amines—compounds typically manufactured from ammonia.

On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.

For their alternative, graduate student Zihui Zhou and professor Omar Yaghi, both at U.C. Berkeley, embedded amines in a crystalline compound with extensive surface area known as a covalent organic framework. The resulting powder, which they named COF-999, is a microscopic scaffolding of hydrocarbons held together by superstrong carbon-nitrogen and carbon-carbon bonds, such as those found in diamonds. The amines sit in the scaffolding’s open spaces, ready to snag passing CO₂ molecules. When Zhou and Yaghi pumped air through a tube packed with COF-999, the powder captured CO₂ at the fastest rate ever measured, the researchers reported in Nature. “We were scrubbing the CO₂ out of the air entirely,” Yaghi says.

Besides equipment, the biggest cost for DAC is often energy to heat the absorbent material so it releases the captured CO₂, which is collected in tanks and later injected underground or sold to industry. The powder released CO₂ when heated to 60 degrees Celsius—a much lower temperature than the more than 100 degrees C needed at current DAC plants. The team then deployed the powder again to grab additional CO₂ from the air. After more than 100 catch-and-release cycles, it showed no significant decline in capacity, according to the study.

The COF-999 compound might also compete with liquid amines used in carbon capture and storage scrubbers on refinery and power plant smokestacks, Yaghi says. It’s light enough—200 grams can draw down as much CO₂ in a year as a large tree—that it could potentially be used onboard ships to strip carbon from their exhaust, too.

Companies already manufacture similar materials, metal organic frameworks, to capture CO₂ from smokestacks as well as for masks to protect against hazardous chemicals. In these crystalline structures, the superstrong bonds are formed between metal compounds rather than hydrocarbons. But Yaghi, who owns a company that produces both types of materials, says ­COF-999 can be more durable, water-resistant and efficient at removing CO₂ than leading metal organic frameworks. A recent Nature Communications study reports that another covalent organic framework based on phosphate bonds also has potential for carbon capture.

The COF-999 powder hasn’t yet been tested for real-life applications, notes Jennifer Wilcox, a University of Pennsylvania chemical engineer who formerly worked on carbon removal at the U.S. Department of Energy. For example, if it restricts airflow too much when coating a filter or formed into pellets, that could increase energy consumption by fans that move the air. Such engineering properties, Wilcox says, “will ultimately dictate costs.”